| EGARDENING INDEX Last modified December 12, 2006 |
|
|
Lawns
|
About a quarter of the Earth's land is naturally grassland. From the tropical savannas of Africa to the temperate prairies of North America, an enormous array of grass species grow around the globe. Over the course of the last century, however, a limited selection of grasses are coming to dominate our urbanized centers. These are the turf grasses used to create lush green lawns. Recently, Dr. Christina Milesi of NASA’s Ames Research Center in California used Landsat satellite data to estimate that there were now at least 32 million acres of lawns across the United States, making it the largest irrigated American crop. About 23% of urbanized land is devoted to turf grass and if behaviors remain the same, this figure will continue to increase. Practical and beautiful, the lawn has spread from a few ornate Elizabethan gardens to the vastness of modern suburbia.
The word laune has been located in Tudor texts dating to1548 and was first used to describe a glade or open space between woods. Some two hundred years later the meaning of the word had changed. Carefully tended swatches of grass had begun appearing in the formal gardens of France and broad expanses of sheared grounds had begun to grace the estates of England. The word lawn evolved to describe these mowed grounds. Mowing, of course, was not done by machine, but rather by grazing animals and laborers with sickles and scythes. With colonization, lawns spread. They were first confined to estate properties and were a symbol of wealth and status. According to Virginia Scott Jenkins, in her book The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession (1994), "front lawns did not catch the popular imagination and were not copied by middle class Americans until the development of suburban housing after the Civil War." Organizations like the American Garden Club encouraged and celebrated the use of turf grasses in garden design. They prescribed "a plot with a single type of grass with no intruding weeds, kept mown at a height of an inch and a half, uniformly green, and neatly edged." Soon lawns were the aesthetic standard for home owners and are now thoroughly part of our cultural identity.
Although I doubt that evolutionary psychologist Steven Pinker is entirely correct in surmising that our desire for lawns harks back to some evolutionary memory of the African steppe, people do display a strong desire to establish lawns. In his recent book, American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn, historian Ted Steinberg attributes this behavior to the need for conformity. While not to down play the significance of genetics and social imitation, lawns would not continue as a social statement if they did not serve us well as play and work areas, if they did not reduce unwanted wildlife in the proximity of dwellings, and if they did not provide an aesthetic function in landscape design. That said, lawns are overused and as such are ecologically unsound.
Lawn grasses require significant inputs of water and energy. Our mowers, blowers and sundry powered lawn maintenance equipment pollute. Large plantings of limited species of grasses are contributing to a shift in soil ecology and animal populations. They are certainly increasing lawn loving pests. Excessive use of chemicals (fertilizers and pesticides) used to keep lawns green and lush are affecting water systems, animal (including human) health, and climate. It is time to work at lawn reduction and environmentally sound lawn maintenance.
Although lawn alternatives are becoming more fashionable,
proponents are often looked upon as social dissidents or at least as
'left-leaning.' This according to York University sociologist, Allen Greenbaum,
in his 2001 thesis titled The Lawn as a Site for Environmental Conflict.
Yet, lawn reduction and the use of alternative ground covers should to be
acceptable and desirable practice. I put it to members of the Horticultural
Society to work on developing alternative landscaping schemes that do not rely
heavily on turf grasses. What is needed are ground covers that are diverse,
functional, fashionable and environmentally sustainable. There are already some
lovely examples in the community and hopefully as you plan your garden designs
for next year, you to can contribute to the change. I would love to collect
examples of your lawn reductions. Please share them with me and I will post them
online (contact
me).
Pictured is a lovely Oakville backyard without any lawn.
To begin your lawn reduction, try and follow the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's recommendations: create or expand beds of native flowers and shrubs, plant a wildflower meadow or another form of native groundcover, allow the lawn to revert to woods. If you keep some area in lawn, lessen environmental problems. Reduce or eliminate pesticides. Use a mulching mower and where possible a non-powered reel mower. Keep powered mowers in efficient operating condition and raise the cutting height to at least 3 inches (7.5cm) during hot summer months. Learn to tolerate, or better still add, a variety of plant species in the lawn. Do not over-fertilize. A slow-release organic fertilizer applied but once, in the fall, is usually sufficient. Also check out the Garden Club of American's brochure entitled The New American Lawn http://www.gcamerica.org/pamphlets/lawnbrochure.html. See further references below.
May toads nestle in your flower
beds and help you tend your beauties in this spring.
References Links and Information
Articles on Lawns - Facts, History and Sociology
Articles on Environmentally Sound Lawn Care
Alternative Lawns
Misc. Info
Lawn insects
Interesting Factoids
"Annually, lawn care is a $30 billion industry in America. One acre of lawn costs an estimated $400-700 each year to maintain — more per acre than to raise corn, rice, or sugarcane." [EPA Eastern Regional Laboratory, Environmental Science Factsheet, August 2005, http://www.epa.gov/NE/lab/pdfs/lablandscaping-factsheet.pdf#search=%22lawn%20%20costs%20an%20estimated%20%24400-700%20each%20year%20to%20maintain%22]
"York University sociologist Allen Greenbaum, whose 600-page PhD thesis was titled "The Lawn as a Site for Environmental Conflict", believes our lawns say a lot about who we are, reported CanWest News Service May 23. "If you were going to guess whether someone is pro-choice or pro-life, you could probably predict it on the basis of their lawn," he said. Greenbaum conducted a study of downtown Toronto homeowners, classifying each lawn into one of five groups natural, ornamental, ordinary lawn (some weeds and bare patches), manicured, and devoid of vegetation. A manicured lawn, he says, "symbolizes taking care, and not taking care is associated with abandonment, crime, urban decay. They're not opposed to using pesticides to control weeds. And manicured lawns tend to be next door to one another. They also tend to be men's lawn's." Politically, these people, he says, are likely to be conservative (leading one to wonder if we've been misled about one of the federal Conservatives' top five priorities: Instead of getting tough on crime, maybe they're really talking about Lawn and Order). The owner of a natural lawn, on the other hand, is more likely left-leaning, Greenbaum adds, viewing city restrictions on things like grass height as esthetic authoritarianism. "It's about artificiality," he say. "Their value system has to do with freedom, diversity and being interesting." CBC, The Current for Show April 05, 2006, Lawn Historian/Sociologist Allen Greenbaum http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2006/200604/20060405.html]
"An estimated 70 million pounds of pesticides are applied on lawns each year—ten times more per acre than are applied to agricultural crops. In 1997, sales of lawn care pesticides in the U.S. accounted for one third of total world expenditure on pesticides." [Audubon Society Lawn care pesticides - an unacceptable risk http://www.audubon.org/bird/at_home/pdf/LawnFlyer.pdf#search=%22An%20estimated%2070%20million%20pounds%20of%20pesticides%20are%20applied%20on%20lawns%20each%20year%22]
"Some 40-60% of the nitrogen fertilizer applied to lawns end up in surface and groundwater, contaminating these waters with excess nutrients. These excess nutrients lead to algal blooms, low dissolved oxygen, and impaired ecological health in our rivers, lakes, ponds, and coastal waters. Conventional lawns contribute to rapid runoff of rainfall compared to natural habitats, causing flooding and erosion." [EPA MidAtlantic Region, Sustainable Landscaping http://www.epa.gov/reg3esd1/garden/presentation.htm]
"Gas-powered lawn equipment produces as much as one-tenth of the smog-forming pollutants from all mobile sources. The average gas mower produces as much air pollution in one year as 43 new cars driving 12,000 miles each. Lawn mowers use 800 million gallons of gas per year." [Aaron Hoover, March 21, 2005, University of Florida News, Engineers: in big picture, gas, cordless mowers equal polluters, http://news.ufl.edu/2005/03/21/mower-pollute/ also Deepak Sivaraman and Angela Lindner Environmental Engineering Science, A Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Gasoline-, Battery-, and Electricity-Powered Lawn Mowers http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ees.2004.21.768#search=%22Lindner%20lawn%20mower%20emissions%22]
"The average homeowner spends 25 hours per year mowing their lawn." [EPA New England Regional Laboratory Natural Landscaping http://www.epa.gov/NE/lab/pdfs/lablandscaping-factsheet.pdf#search=%22lawn%20chemicals%20EPA%20estimated%20that%2070%20million%20pounds%22]
"According to Statistics Canada the use of gasoline-powered lawn equipment releases about 80 000 tonnes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Canada every year.Nitrogen-based fertilizers produce nitrous oxide (N2O). Nitrous oxide is over 300 times more effective than CO2 in greenhouse warming. Such fertilizers are overused regularly by homeowners on their lawns and gardens. In addition to GHG emissions, residential abuse of fertilizers and pesticides are responsible for surface and groundwater contamination. Approximately 50 million kilograms of chemicals are dumped on Canadian lawns and gardens(vi) every year. Such excess use has far-reaching impacts on human health, as well as climate and the environment." [Climate change and your yard http://www.climatechangeconnection.org/pages/yardcare.html]
"In the United States it is estimated that 67 million pounds of pesticide products are applied to lawns each year at a rate of up to 10 pounds per acre (Koppell 1994). This is much higher than agricultural application which averages about 2.7 pounds per acre. In the USA, it is estimated that between $1.5 and $2 billion is spent on lawn pesticides each year. In Canada, according to one survey by Statistics Canada, 31% of households report the use of chemical pesticides and 47% chemical fertilizers. The rates are lower in Nova Scotia, 18.7% and 35% respectively (Statistics Canada 1994). Only 5% of the total pesticides used are for domestic purposes such as lawn care, but this occurs in densely populated areas. Is such usage safe, or are there unforeseen risks which are becoming manifest? Steinberg estimates the U.S. lawn care industry at US$40 billion a year, more than the gross domestic product of Vietnam. Comparatively, Canadian spending appears modest -- $1.6 billion in 2004, according to Statistics Canada. But that's double the amount Canadians spent four years earlier, which signals a growing marketplace in our own front yard." [Roy Fox, The Impact of Chemical Lawn Care on Human Health http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Environment/RATE/royfox1.html]
Sources of organic fertilizer from The Garden Club of America's New American Lawn http://www.gcamerica.org/pamphlets/lawnbrochure.html
Nitrogen (N) - Blood meal, cottonseed meal, fish emulsion, grass clippings, and compost.
Phosphorus (P) - rock phosphate, compost, bone meal.
Potassium (K) - green sand, fireplace wood ashes, compost, aged manure, seaweed.
Minerals (magnesium, zinc, iron, sulfur) - kelp meal, dolomitic limestone.